NEWS RELEASE In a Class Action Alleging Defective Washing Machines, Murray & Murray Obtains Federal Ruling Denying a Motion to Strike Class Allegations and Allowing Ohio Products Liability Claims Brought Jointly with Common Law Claims

September 6, 2013

(SANDUSKY, Ohio) -  A Toledo federal district court recently issued an opinion that helps to preserve important Ohio consumer rights in a class action lawsuit brought by Maureen Huffman alleging Electrolux North America Inc.(“Electrolux”) produced and sold Huffman and other purchasers defective front loading washing machines.  Mrs. Huffman seeks to represent a class defined as: “All residents of Ohio who purchased a front loading washing machine manufactured, sold and/or distributed by defendant and purchased for primarily personal, family or household purposes in Ohio and not for resale.”  The legal action against Electrolux claims that the machines do not drain properly, which causes mold and pervasive foul odors to later manifest.   The case is captioned Huffman v. Electronic, N.D. Ohio. No.  3:12-cv-02681-JGC.  Huffman is represented by attorney, John T. Murray, a partner in the law firm of Murray & Murray Co., L.P.A.

The court’s August 13, 2013 opinion provided two important victories for Ohio consumer rights.  First, it denied Electrolux’s argument that a class could not be certified, which was made before the plaintiff was able to obtain evidence through the discovery process.  Defendant companies increasingly seek to use early motions to strike class allegations to fight consumer claims before they have been able to go through the traditional process of gathering evidence and submitting a motion to certify a class action.  This opinion, like the recent decision by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in a class action against Whirlpool, pushes back against these continued efforts by companies to stop consumer claims before they start.

Second, it provided that under Ohio law one may bring a state products liability claim without being forced to give up alternative claims.  The court found consumers may bring Ohio products liability claims along with common law claims, finding that otherwise they would be denied their right to open courts under Article I, Section 16, of the Ohio Constitution. 

As Electrolux’s Motion to Strike was denied and its Motion to Dismiss was also denied in large part, the case will now continue into the class certification discovery phase as to all claims except for implied warranty, which the court held was barred by the limitations stated in the Electrolux product warranty.  This case continues Murray & Murray’s long tradition of fighting to protect Ohio consumer rights.

ABOUT THE FIRM:                                                         

Founded in 1931, Murray & Murray is operated by the Murray family.  The firm has fourteen attorneys including nine Murray partners.  Located in Sandusky, Ohio, Murray & Murray provides legal representation for clients throughout Ohio and offers a free initial consultation.  Murray & Murray's focus areas are personal injury and consumer protection.


John T. Murray,, 419-624-3000.      

Learn about us  at Better Business Bureau Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association
Learn about Solar Array
Murray & Murray Co. LPA   |   111 East Shoreline Drive   |   Sandusky, OH 44870-2517   |   1-800-624-3009   |   419-624-3000
All Rights Reserved 2019, Murray and Murray - Admin Login   |   Web Development by Alt Media Studios